Can't run on his record?

by: Strummerson

Mon May 07, 2012 at 08:49:45 AM EDT



The Obama team is waiting far too long to respond to this orchestrated talking point.  Repetition makes it conventional 'wisdom.'  By not responding with detailed and targeted 'Hell yeah we can,' it makes it seem as if Obama doesn't want to.  It's not the easiest of sells, given the economy.  But there's got to be more to it than "GM is Alive and Osama is Dead."  There needs to be a counter-punch.  I'd recommend every liberal pundit and every democrat with a mouth piece begin repeating:

They say Obama can't run on his record because they can't come out and say they want us to return to the Bush policies that got us into this mess in the first place.  No one will buy that.  And that's what they want to do.  Not because it's good for the economy.  Not because it's good for the nation.  But only because it's good for their elitist patrons.  Obama has worked hard to stabilize our economy for rich, poor, and middle class alike.  He's shown willingness to include conservative proposals.  But they'd rather obstruct approaches that don't serve their ideology and clientele and even those that do in order to paint him as a failure.  In the face of organized and zealous obstruction, this President has always sought to do what is right for the American people.  Cutting taxes even further on the so-called job creators will not get them to start investing the capital they are hording in the Cayman Islands and Swiss Bank accounts.  It will only give them more money to squirrel away in their tax shelters while the middle class continues to struggle.  What will encourage them to actually invest in job-creating endeavors is the stabilization of the middle class so that demand in the market will lessen the risk of new endeavors.  When the middle class is buying, investors will capitalize on that demand even if their tax rates are slightly higher.  President Obama's record shows he supports the policies that will ensure opportunity for all Americans to prosper, from the top to the bottom.  Where he's been able to implement those policies, we've seen success.  Far from a big government socialist bogeyman with a failed record, his record reveals a prudent, pragmatic, and principled American approach to an economy that only thrives when both the private and public sectors fulfill their functions.
Strummerson :: Can't run on his record?
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Well, looky here! (2.00 / 4)

This is simply awesome.  I do, however, think it important to get the word "record" in there.  It's important to reclaim terms.  I think it's important to re-embrace the terms "freedom" and "opportunity" that we've largely abandoned to GOP hands.  We've got the best visual for it: A black democrat in the White House emphatically illustrates which party's policies increase freedom and opportunity.  

The future is unwritten


I dunno. (2.00 / 4)
It is six months out and "normal" folks are getting the family ready for summer, not paying attention to an election in November.

I also seem to recall lots of folks screaming in 2008 for the campaign to react faster but things seemed to work out pretty well then.  And I think the campaign is going to go around the national media with boots on the ground and locally-targeted efforts.

"When Fascism comes to America, it will come wrapped in teh stupid and waving a gun" ~ Esteev on Wonkette


Even if it's early (2.00 / 4)
it's important not to let the opposition set the terms of the debate.  If nothing else, the campaign needs to establish its own narrative to those of us who are more engaged right now, who will represent the boots on the ground.  That way it doesn't come off as reactive.  They will have their narrative in place.  It's not premature to establish ours.

The future is unwritten

[ Parent ]
Which... (2.00 / 3)
Probably explains the $25M advertising buy announced today.  I agree with both you and Happy; steady as she goes but take nothing for granted.

[ Parent ]
Can you spell "Swift Boat"? (0.00 / 0)
SBVT first went public with a May 4, 2004, press conference declaring opposition to Kerry. When the press conference garnered little attention, the organization produced television advertisements. On August 5, 2004, SBVT began airing a one-minute television spot in three hotly contested states in the ongoing presidential election. The advertisement, entitled "Any Questions?", was a collage of short clips of 13 SBVT members, many who stated they "served with John Kerry" or had direct contact with Kerry during his service in Vietnam. The veterans appearing in the ad said Kerry was dishonest, unreliable, unfit to lead, and had dishonored his country and fellow veterans. Only one of the men in the advertisement (Steve Gardner) served under Kerry, but some sailed alongside Kerry's Swift boat on multi-boat patrols.

Among the first to question the first ad was Republican Senator John McCain, a Bush supporter, Vietnam veteran, and former POW. He said, "I condemn the [SBVT] ad. It is dishonest and dishonorable. I think it is very, very wrong".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...


[ Parent ]
Search




Advanced Search
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Blog Roll
Andrew Bacevich
Angry Bear
Angry Black Lady
Balloon Juice
Black Kos
Booman Tribune
Charles P. Pierce
Crooks and Liars
Daily Kos
Five Thirty Eight
Huffington Post
Juan Cole
Maddow Blog
P.M. Carpenter
Political Wire
RumpRoast
Scholars & Rogues
Stonekettle
Talking Points Memo
The Field
Washington Monthly
Wonkette
VetVoice
Moose With Blogs
Atdleft
Barr
BorderJumpers
BTchakir
Canadian Gal
Charles Lemos
Cheryl Kopec
Curtis Walker
Douglas Watts
Hubie Stubert
Intrepid Liberal
ItStands
Janicket
JoeTrippi
John Allen
LibraryGrape
MichaelEvan
National Gadfly
Peter Jukes
Senate Guru
Zachary Karabell




Back to Top

Posting Guidelines  |  FAQ  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact the Moose  |  Contact Congress
Powered by: SoapBlox